TL;DR
A controlled examination of R1-Zero-style reinforcement learning that separates robust training effects from claims that are sensitive to setup, reward design, and evaluation choices.
Why it matters
Reasoning-RL results are easy to overread. This work is useful because it asks which observations reproduce across settings and which depend on implementation details.
Key findings
- 01
Training dynamics should be interpreted alongside reward and evaluation design.
- 02
Reproducibility requires reporting the complete optimization setup, not only headline benchmark scores.
Scaling dimensions
Models, methods & benchmarks
- Algorithms
- R1-Zero-style RL
Topics